Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.
Date: April 29, 2024 Mon
Time: 11:51 pm
Time: 11:51 pm
Results for offenders (ohio)
1 results foundAuthor: Latessa, Edward Title: Creation and Validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System: Final Report Summary: "This report outlines the development and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections contracted with the University of Cincinnati, Center for Criminal Justice Research to create a risk assessment system that provided assessments at multiple points in the criminal justice system and that was validated on an Ohio population. A major goal of the project was to develop assessments that abided by the principles of effective classification by constructing assessments that 1) separated Ohio offenders into risk groups based on their likelihood to recidivate, 2) identified dynamic risk factors that can be used to prioritize programmatic needs, and 3) identify potential barriers to treatment. The Ohio Risk Assessment System was created using a prospective design that involved conducting in-depth structured interviews of over 1,800 offenders at the following stages in Ohio’s justice system: pretrial, community supervision, prison intake, and community reentry. After interviews were conducted, offenders were tracked for approximately one year to gather follow-up information on recidivism. Five assessment instruments were created using items that were related to recidivism: The Pretrial Assessment Tool, The Community Supervision Tool, The Community Supervision Screening Tool, The Prison Intake Tool, and the Reentry Tool. Validation involved examining the predictive power of the assessment instruments. The results reveal that all assessment instruments are able to significantly distinguish between risk levels. Further, r values are relatively large, and depending upon the assessment instrument, range from .22 to .44. Concurrent validity also was examined by comparing the predictive power of each assessment tool to the LSI-R and the Wisconsin Risk / Needs instruments. These results revealed that the instruments for the Ohio Risk Assessment System performed as well if not better than both of the other instruments." Details: Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, School of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research, 2009. 65p. Source: Internet Resource; Accessed August 8, 2010 at http://www.assessments.com/assessments_documentation/ORAS/ORAS_Final_Report_and_Validation.pdf Year: 2009 Country: United States URL: http://www.assessments.com/assessments_documentation/ORAS/ORAS_Final_Report_and_Validation.pdf Shelf Number: 119579 Keywords: Classification of Prisoners (Ohio)Offenders (Ohio)Risk Assessment |